← Back to context

Comment by mc32

3 hours ago

Do you think this is a consequence of the seemingly quarterly RIFs at Oracle? Is it that offshoring wasn’t such a good idea?

6 comments

mc32

Reply
lenerdenator  3 hours ago

The irony, of course, is that this will likely have a negative impact upon Oracle's reputation, which will have a negative impact upon its value, which will then be resolved with more RIFs.

It's okay. Larry got another island.

  • jandrese  2 hours ago

    At this point if Oracle's reputation has any more negative impact it is liable to roll over and suddenly have an amazing reputation.

  • dylan604  2 hours ago

    > have a negative impact upon Oracle's reputation

    Do they have any positive reputation left, or is it just more negative from the previous negative position?

  • jmclnx  3 hours ago

    I doubt it, look at all other breaches over the years.

    If anything Oracle will "contribute" a lot to congress people's midterm reelection and in a few months all will be forgotten and Oracle will get more Gov. contracts.

    • toyg  1 hour ago

      I mean, the whole business basically started in order to get government contracts. Not even IBM can boast that.