← Back to context

Comment by ameliaquining

2 hours ago

My comment was aimed at the particular critique I was replying to, namely, that using XML for ordinary structured data is bad because XML is a markup language. I am not defending SAML more broadly or claiming that none of its mistakes were foreseeable, and particularly am not defending the idea of signing a DOM tree instead of a sequence of bytes. (Though the latter mistake is in principle orthogonal to XML vs. JSON; I confess to not really understanding why they're so correlated.)

OK, totally fair: I'm hair-trigger about attempts to rehabilitate DSIG and SAML, but I have basically no opinions about XML itself. Sorry!