Comment by dylan604
5 hours ago
It sounds like something with a 90% error rate would be better to just do the opposite of what was determined and suddenly have a 10% error rate??
5 hours ago
It sounds like something with a 90% error rate would be better to just do the opposite of what was determined and suddenly have a 10% error rate??
That's not how type 1 & type 2 errors work. The article is describing type 2 (false negative) and inverting the output has no correlation with the percent of false positives (type 1)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_I_and_type_II_errors