← Back to context

Comment by burgerone

4 days ago

I'm positively surprised that their tool is not yet another LLM wrapper.

The quality of research (and by extent HN submissions) has really plummeted since LLMs have become marginally useful

(2024) in title/article date already spoils that, this article comes from BC/AC era boundary, so the tool itself must've been written in BC era. LLMs wouldn't be useful for any such thing for another year.

(BC and AC are obviously Before and After ChatGPT.)