← Back to context

Comment by smusamashah

4 days ago

I think Opus 5.5 is at same level now. I have seen too many videos made by Opus 5.5 today on twitter.

https://x.com/victormustar/status/2102707412704919910 horse galloping pixel art

https://x.com/LexnLin/status/2102133072585965759 moving train pixel art animation

https://x.com/jkeatn/status/2102441348075057539 painting with code

https://x.com/LCSlates/status/2102503027340988559 video, very detailed prompt though

https://x.com/aj_dev_smith/status/2102504509637587339 generated song/music with code

https://x.com/aj_dev_smith/status/2102575577563570450 another song

5 comments

smusamashah

Reply
prideout  4 days ago

These are amazing but the parent comment is referring to vision comprehension, not generation.

  • smusamashah  4 days ago

    Yup and I think these examples demonstrate just that. From my experience, both Claude and ChatGPT iterate over what they can see to build things like these. I don't think these examples are made without vision.

  • torginus  2 days ago

    Aren't these the same thing, to some extent? I remember my music teacher told me, that as long as you can hear your false tones, she can teach you how to sing, no matter how bad you are at it. But if you can't hear it, she cannot help you.

    AI is the same - as long as it can see well, it can tell the difference between what it outputs and what its supposed to. If you subtract the two, you have an error, and you can hill-climb on that.