← Back to context

Comment by epistasis

18 hours ago

It turns out that economic cost of labor and inputs also factors into energy considerations. It's rather soft thinking to ignore them, and leads to very bad conclusions.

Sure labor amount is strongly correlated with EROI

  • Why use a bad metric when one can use the actually relevant metrics?

    I see this from nuclear advocates when they talk about "energy density". Energy density (or EROI) are only relevant insofar as they affect cost. Why not just use cost? (The answer is that cost isn't giving the nuclear advocates the answer they want, so they have to lie and use some substitute metric.)