← Back to context

Comment by AnthonyMouse

11 hours ago

But now you're using older designs to argue against not building newer ones.

The explosion at Chernobyl wasn't actually a nuclear reaction. It was that the reactor got hot enough to separate the cooling water into hydrogen and oxygen, and then you can get a hydrogen explosion.

If the primary coolant is water. And the reactor is designed in such a way that that can happen.

Meanwhile you can use other primary coolants or other designs where that isn't a thing. There are designs that don't explode even if you lose power entirely. At which point the cost of an evacuation that the design doesn't require you to do, isn't a cost that you have to pay.