← Back to context Comment by Matl 3 days ago [flagged] 4 comments Matl Reply ffsm8 3 days ago [flagged] sethammons 3 days ago Are you suggesting a bribe to Trump wouldn't "solve" the issue? His actions shout otherwise. ffsm8 3 days ago Trump is as corrupt as you can get, so yeah it would solve the issue.But that's an entirely different matter to the original claim. Matl 3 days ago The 'facts' that you keep saying that were wrong were only so if you take what the Trump admin said about it as 'facts' (ie the reason for the targeting). There's no reason to do so at this point.
ffsm8 3 days ago [flagged] sethammons 3 days ago Are you suggesting a bribe to Trump wouldn't "solve" the issue? His actions shout otherwise. ffsm8 3 days ago Trump is as corrupt as you can get, so yeah it would solve the issue.But that's an entirely different matter to the original claim. Matl 3 days ago The 'facts' that you keep saying that were wrong were only so if you take what the Trump admin said about it as 'facts' (ie the reason for the targeting). There's no reason to do so at this point.
sethammons 3 days ago Are you suggesting a bribe to Trump wouldn't "solve" the issue? His actions shout otherwise. ffsm8 3 days ago Trump is as corrupt as you can get, so yeah it would solve the issue.But that's an entirely different matter to the original claim.
ffsm8 3 days ago Trump is as corrupt as you can get, so yeah it would solve the issue.But that's an entirely different matter to the original claim.
Matl 3 days ago The 'facts' that you keep saying that were wrong were only so if you take what the Trump admin said about it as 'facts' (ie the reason for the targeting). There's no reason to do so at this point.
[flagged]
Are you suggesting a bribe to Trump wouldn't "solve" the issue? His actions shout otherwise.
Trump is as corrupt as you can get, so yeah it would solve the issue.
But that's an entirely different matter to the original claim.
The 'facts' that you keep saying that were wrong were only so if you take what the Trump admin said about it as 'facts' (ie the reason for the targeting). There's no reason to do so at this point.