Comment by foldr
4 hours ago
What would the argument even be here? That the UK can never be a democracy because of what Henry VIII did in the 16th century?
4 hours ago
What would the argument even be here? That the UK can never be a democracy because of what Henry VIII did in the 16th century?
No.
But processes that exist to preserve democracy that arent governed by that democracy are problematic. Saying the "king would never do..." when a king has makes the argument silly.
The UK is not alone in this - a great example is the filibuster in the us (a senate rule).
Hmm, so your argument actually is that a politically motivated prosecution in the 16th century that occurred before the UK even existed, before constitutional democracies were much of a thing, and that couldn't occur under present UK constitutional arrangements, is proof that the UK at present is not a democracy. I'm not sure if you're in a position to call other people's argument's "silly".