← Back to context Comment by ahartmetz 2 days ago They can't use the same land anymore. 7 comments ahartmetz Reply twoodfin 2 days ago That’s true of everything in limited supply. kraken_cult 2 days ago And what's being litigated here is how people deal with limited supply when "just make more money" isn't a real option. twoodfin 2 days ago So owning anything that’s in limited supply produces “externalities” that should be taxed? 1 reply → tomrod 1 day ago Who is litigating? VirusNewbie 2 days ago Not if there are either substitutes or financial incentive to make more. Capitalism is pretty great, it just doesn't work for certain natural resources that have a very finite supply. tomrod 1 day ago Why not?
twoodfin 2 days ago That’s true of everything in limited supply. kraken_cult 2 days ago And what's being litigated here is how people deal with limited supply when "just make more money" isn't a real option. twoodfin 2 days ago So owning anything that’s in limited supply produces “externalities” that should be taxed? 1 reply → tomrod 1 day ago Who is litigating? VirusNewbie 2 days ago Not if there are either substitutes or financial incentive to make more. Capitalism is pretty great, it just doesn't work for certain natural resources that have a very finite supply. tomrod 1 day ago Why not?
kraken_cult 2 days ago And what's being litigated here is how people deal with limited supply when "just make more money" isn't a real option. twoodfin 2 days ago So owning anything that’s in limited supply produces “externalities” that should be taxed? 1 reply → tomrod 1 day ago Who is litigating?
twoodfin 2 days ago So owning anything that’s in limited supply produces “externalities” that should be taxed? 1 reply →
VirusNewbie 2 days ago Not if there are either substitutes or financial incentive to make more. Capitalism is pretty great, it just doesn't work for certain natural resources that have a very finite supply. tomrod 1 day ago Why not?
That’s true of everything in limited supply.
And what's being litigated here is how people deal with limited supply when "just make more money" isn't a real option.
So owning anything that’s in limited supply produces “externalities” that should be taxed?
1 reply →
Who is litigating?
Not if there are either substitutes or financial incentive to make more. Capitalism is pretty great, it just doesn't work for certain natural resources that have a very finite supply.
Why not?