Comment by handoflixue
3 hours ago
> Actively handicapping a product that's otherwise capable qualifies.
But they're not actively handicapping it. They're saying it would be wildly irresponsible to assume it's "otherwise capable".
And very critically: they have taken zero steps to "actively handicap" it in any way.
The Claude they sell to me seems quite actively handicapped when I ask it questions about cyber security or biology.
Wanting veto power in execution is functionally the same as actively handicapping it, regardless of how implemented.