← Back to context Comment by carlosjobim 2 days ago I assume value was included in the definition of "better". 2 comments carlosjobim Reply paulcole 1 day ago Are you assuming cost of switching is included in the definition of “better”? carlosjobim 1 day ago There really is no cost of switching. The only thing is that we might not be bothered to switch to something better if we're already very happy with what we have. I think all of us are like that.
paulcole 1 day ago Are you assuming cost of switching is included in the definition of “better”? carlosjobim 1 day ago There really is no cost of switching. The only thing is that we might not be bothered to switch to something better if we're already very happy with what we have. I think all of us are like that.
carlosjobim 1 day ago There really is no cost of switching. The only thing is that we might not be bothered to switch to something better if we're already very happy with what we have. I think all of us are like that.
Are you assuming cost of switching is included in the definition of “better”?
There really is no cost of switching. The only thing is that we might not be bothered to switch to something better if we're already very happy with what we have. I think all of us are like that.