← Back to context

Comment by matsemann

10 hours ago

> For who though?

For math, the value of proving a theorem is often not proving the theorem (which most people already believe correctly to be true or false), but the path taken there, the new math invented, and how it can be applied to other problems. The end result is therefore almost inconsequential in moving math forwards.

> the path taken there, the new math invented, and how it can be applied to other problems.

What happens when AI is better at that part too? Are you confident it's not already better?