← Back to context

Comment by simoncion

1 day ago

It seems like you're trying to claim that -unlike OpenAI- Anthropic has a robust culture of security and safety and would never do something so negligent as test a highly-capable computer-attacking tool that has been instructed to attack computers in a test environment that's connected to the Internet.

Well: <https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49862136>

No, I'm not implying that. I'm suggesting that many more of these issues are likely to come from OpenAI due to their culture (not that that is okay). Anthropic has no excuse, I know they know better. One might argue that they were initially negligent because they didn't really believe it would do anything like this. But having further incidents is pure negligence at best.

  • > I'm suggesting that many more of these issues are likely to come from OpenAI due to their culture...

    Both companies have been equally reckless with the tools they sell and the tools they test. Your warm and fuzzy feelings that come from speaking with a handful of line workers at Anthropic don't change that fact.