Comment by loeg
6 hours ago
It was ostensibly necessary for other, arguably more important features. Persistent undo maybe just isn't that important? I certainly don't use it nearly as much as the author seems to.
6 hours ago
It was ostensibly necessary for other, arguably more important features. Persistent undo maybe just isn't that important? I certainly don't use it nearly as much as the author seems to.
Why not give it a different name, so that it would not break vim?
Just editing the primary file without corresponding update to persistent undo record already breaks persistent undo. Do you prevent users from editing their own files in your text editor?