← Back to context Comment by jLaForest 20 hours ago [flagged] 5 comments jLaForest Reply tomhow 19 hours ago Don’t jeer or snipe on HN. Even if your framing is true, it’s an awful way to address anyone. If it’s false (which it likely is) it’s utterly vile. jLaForest 4 hours ago > If it’s false (which it likely is)it isnt false and you would know that if you read the article. Please dont comment on HN without reading the article.... khazhoux 19 hours ago We recommend reading the article before commenting. jLaForest 4 hours ago i read the article... that is its entire premise khazhoux 1 hour ago 1. Nowhere does the article mention his current wealth (or lack of)2. He didn’t “forget” — he misunderstood his contract, and only caught the error much later.3. He’s not looking for pity. He writes: “I offer this in the spirit of a cautionary tale. I remain sanguine, and amused.”Maybe something about his story bothered you?
tomhow 19 hours ago Don’t jeer or snipe on HN. Even if your framing is true, it’s an awful way to address anyone. If it’s false (which it likely is) it’s utterly vile. jLaForest 4 hours ago > If it’s false (which it likely is)it isnt false and you would know that if you read the article. Please dont comment on HN without reading the article....
jLaForest 4 hours ago > If it’s false (which it likely is)it isnt false and you would know that if you read the article. Please dont comment on HN without reading the article....
khazhoux 19 hours ago We recommend reading the article before commenting. jLaForest 4 hours ago i read the article... that is its entire premise khazhoux 1 hour ago 1. Nowhere does the article mention his current wealth (or lack of)2. He didn’t “forget” — he misunderstood his contract, and only caught the error much later.3. He’s not looking for pity. He writes: “I offer this in the spirit of a cautionary tale. I remain sanguine, and amused.”Maybe something about his story bothered you?
jLaForest 4 hours ago i read the article... that is its entire premise khazhoux 1 hour ago 1. Nowhere does the article mention his current wealth (or lack of)2. He didn’t “forget” — he misunderstood his contract, and only caught the error much later.3. He’s not looking for pity. He writes: “I offer this in the spirit of a cautionary tale. I remain sanguine, and amused.”Maybe something about his story bothered you?
khazhoux 1 hour ago 1. Nowhere does the article mention his current wealth (or lack of)2. He didn’t “forget” — he misunderstood his contract, and only caught the error much later.3. He’s not looking for pity. He writes: “I offer this in the spirit of a cautionary tale. I remain sanguine, and amused.”Maybe something about his story bothered you?
Don’t jeer or snipe on HN. Even if your framing is true, it’s an awful way to address anyone. If it’s false (which it likely is) it’s utterly vile.
> If it’s false (which it likely is)
it isnt false and you would know that if you read the article. Please dont comment on HN without reading the article....
We recommend reading the article before commenting.
i read the article... that is its entire premise
1. Nowhere does the article mention his current wealth (or lack of)
2. He didn’t “forget” — he misunderstood his contract, and only caught the error much later.
3. He’s not looking for pity. He writes: “I offer this in the spirit of a cautionary tale. I remain sanguine, and amused.”
Maybe something about his story bothered you?