← Back to context Comment by skinfaxi 10 hours ago > Cost of litigation should be proportional to a reasonable settlement.What do you mean by this? 5 comments skinfaxi Reply gchamonlive 10 hours ago that it's absurd that for a say 200k case the litigation could cost 200k+ NetMageSCW 8 hours ago Cost of settlement is not proportional to work required. gchamonlive 8 hours ago It's still absurd, because justice in this case doesn't come from equating these financial costs, this is an unfair system that privileges those with big pockets. 2 replies →
gchamonlive 10 hours ago that it's absurd that for a say 200k case the litigation could cost 200k+ NetMageSCW 8 hours ago Cost of settlement is not proportional to work required. gchamonlive 8 hours ago It's still absurd, because justice in this case doesn't come from equating these financial costs, this is an unfair system that privileges those with big pockets. 2 replies →
NetMageSCW 8 hours ago Cost of settlement is not proportional to work required. gchamonlive 8 hours ago It's still absurd, because justice in this case doesn't come from equating these financial costs, this is an unfair system that privileges those with big pockets. 2 replies →
gchamonlive 8 hours ago It's still absurd, because justice in this case doesn't come from equating these financial costs, this is an unfair system that privileges those with big pockets. 2 replies →
that it's absurd that for a say 200k case the litigation could cost 200k+
Cost of settlement is not proportional to work required.
It's still absurd, because justice in this case doesn't come from equating these financial costs, this is an unfair system that privileges those with big pockets.
2 replies →