← Back to context Comment by gchamonlive 11 hours ago that it's absurd that for a say 200k case the litigation could cost 200k+ 4 comments gchamonlive Reply NetMageSCW 10 hours ago Cost of settlement is not proportional to work required. gchamonlive 9 hours ago It's still absurd, because justice in this case doesn't come from equating these financial costs, this is an unfair system that privileges those with big pockets. echoangle 3 hours ago What’s the alternative? Which system would allow people to sue for $10 if the work required to do that is worth significantly more? 1 reply →
NetMageSCW 10 hours ago Cost of settlement is not proportional to work required. gchamonlive 9 hours ago It's still absurd, because justice in this case doesn't come from equating these financial costs, this is an unfair system that privileges those with big pockets. echoangle 3 hours ago What’s the alternative? Which system would allow people to sue for $10 if the work required to do that is worth significantly more? 1 reply →
gchamonlive 9 hours ago It's still absurd, because justice in this case doesn't come from equating these financial costs, this is an unfair system that privileges those with big pockets. echoangle 3 hours ago What’s the alternative? Which system would allow people to sue for $10 if the work required to do that is worth significantly more? 1 reply →
echoangle 3 hours ago What’s the alternative? Which system would allow people to sue for $10 if the work required to do that is worth significantly more? 1 reply →
Cost of settlement is not proportional to work required.
It's still absurd, because justice in this case doesn't come from equating these financial costs, this is an unfair system that privileges those with big pockets.
What’s the alternative? Which system would allow people to sue for $10 if the work required to do that is worth significantly more?
1 reply →