← Back to context Comment by WarmWash 2 hours ago If you're in the city a car shouldn't even be a major consideration (ideally). 2 comments WarmWash Reply axus 2 hours ago That's true for majority of cases, but a small percentage of Tokyo that needs to visit places taxis and trains don't go is still a large number.Thinking 10 years down the road, will autonomous rentals be geo-fenced and not suitable for multi-day trips to rural places? kraig911 1 hour ago A car should always be a major consideration for someone's needs. Especially if you have a family with young children or are disabled. Discounting cars as useless because mass transit exists is a terrible idea.
axus 2 hours ago That's true for majority of cases, but a small percentage of Tokyo that needs to visit places taxis and trains don't go is still a large number.Thinking 10 years down the road, will autonomous rentals be geo-fenced and not suitable for multi-day trips to rural places?
kraig911 1 hour ago A car should always be a major consideration for someone's needs. Especially if you have a family with young children or are disabled. Discounting cars as useless because mass transit exists is a terrible idea.
That's true for majority of cases, but a small percentage of Tokyo that needs to visit places taxis and trains don't go is still a large number.
Thinking 10 years down the road, will autonomous rentals be geo-fenced and not suitable for multi-day trips to rural places?
A car should always be a major consideration for someone's needs. Especially if you have a family with young children or are disabled. Discounting cars as useless because mass transit exists is a terrible idea.