← Back to context

Comment by adrian_b

6 hours ago

That may very well be true, but none of those has published anything of comparable importance and quality as any of the many publications of von Neumann.

Whether some people have really superior intellects is completely irrelevant for the rest of the humans unless they distribute to the others some useful products of their intellect.

Von Neumann is one of the hundreds of people from the past who have left a priceless intellectual heritage to me and to the remainder of the mankind, so I am indebted and grateful to them.

I have no reason to feel any debt or gratitude to any of the employees of OpenAI or Anthropic.

Jane Street has published a few useful articles, so I have some gratitude towards them, but none of those was even remotely similar in importance to any page written by von Neumann.

It's an interesting discussion topic. If we have people today who are just as smart and industrious as Neumann, why aren't they making a worldwide impact? Or, if they are, why is the attribution going to the companies they work for instead of them?

It raises questions like, is it even possible to work for a company while getting credit for world-changing results?

And it implies that at any point in time, there might be thousands of Neumanns in the world, and that initial conditions matter a lot more than ability.