Comment by UncleOxidant
6 hours ago
If they really insist on no LLM involvement at all then they're going to fall behind and lose out. Your LLM use case seems really very conservative - you didn't write any code with it, you just use it to confirm the bug. There are many OSS projects that are also taking a similar hardline against LLMs - people are going to fork them and then move on. I've had LLMs fix bugs/add features to a couple of projects like this and, well, they're missing out on the fixes/added features that I'm using locally.
People keep promising me that I'll be left behind, but somehow it never seems to happen.
They remind me of the "have fun staying poor" people from crypto
I'd really love to figure out how to stay behind, but the people who keep insisting I'll be left behind are doing their level best to prevent it.
TBF, most people did stay poor, they just didn't really get richer.
They are doing fine, all this "left behind" talk has no basis other than cope.