Well that’s fascinating. The answer is a small amount was Claude written, like one of the image captions when I had it find the render and insert it, and I had it do a brief grammar and spelling check, but very little. Most of those chunks that tool has flagged were 100% handwritten.
FWIW, we've been finding that tools like grammar checkers far more imprints on text than people intend when they use them (https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que...). It is one of the two most common reasons why text gets classified as genai even when the author didn't use tools to generate their text. (The other is automatic translators.)
Well that’s fascinating. The answer is a small amount was Claude written, like one of the image captions when I had it find the render and insert it, and I had it do a brief grammar and spelling check, but very little. Most of those chunks that tool has flagged were 100% handwritten.
FWIW, we've been finding that tools like grammar checkers far more imprints on text than people intend when they use them (https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que...). It is one of the two most common reasons why text gets classified as genai even when the author didn't use tools to generate their text. (The other is automatic translators.)
s/claude/codex