← Back to context Comment by khazhoux 18 hours ago There is still no conclusive explanation. You can find reputable sources for either theory. 2 comments khazhoux Reply ngaiorn 6 hours ago >You can find reputable sources for either theory.So why are people citing 2020 reports from German intelligence agencies?The expert consensus is that it was natural. It's not close. You are free to reject that consensus but should be aware that you are doing so.https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanmic/article/PIIS2666-5... shlant 18 hours ago > You can find reputable sources for either theory.I get so tired of hearing this rationalization. It's anti-science. Not all evidence is equal and the preponderance of evidence is heavily skewed to it being zoonotic.
ngaiorn 6 hours ago >You can find reputable sources for either theory.So why are people citing 2020 reports from German intelligence agencies?The expert consensus is that it was natural. It's not close. You are free to reject that consensus but should be aware that you are doing so.https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanmic/article/PIIS2666-5...
shlant 18 hours ago > You can find reputable sources for either theory.I get so tired of hearing this rationalization. It's anti-science. Not all evidence is equal and the preponderance of evidence is heavily skewed to it being zoonotic.
>You can find reputable sources for either theory.
So why are people citing 2020 reports from German intelligence agencies?
The expert consensus is that it was natural. It's not close. You are free to reject that consensus but should be aware that you are doing so.
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanmic/article/PIIS2666-5...
> You can find reputable sources for either theory.
I get so tired of hearing this rationalization. It's anti-science. Not all evidence is equal and the preponderance of evidence is heavily skewed to it being zoonotic.