← Back to context

Comment by rgblambda

10 hours ago

I was actually just implying that it looks unprofessional. Say they cut an important security feature. Don't try to guess why.

They are not interested in shoveling corporate slop. They dont know why, and so, that is what they said. That is a commendable trait and google has many things to answer for. Being silent only serves to benefit google by concealing this behaviour further.

It entirely depends on the strategy you try to implement through your communication.

That is generally true: prior to any professional communication you have a goal, assumptions, messaging, etc. Why would you produce communication at all, if you had not?

Marketing people often think there is a cookie-cutter rulebook you should follow, but there is not.

We are living in the "the bird is freed" and "nice genes" era of corporate communication.

Well you clearly didn't realise what you did.

Oh, and I'm not going to tell you what it was, and 'don't try to guess'.

/s

  • I'm not entirely sure what I "did". Given that I don't do comms for a serious open source project, mind letting me in on your secret?