Comment by customguy
9 hours ago
The act of giving involves someone who receives, that doesn't make it anti-giving.
> it is anti-solidarity if you benefit from a system that you have never contributed
What's your stance on disabled children who can never sustain themselves?
I don’t have any problem with disabled children or even adults being taken care of by the society. But that’s not the point. Fully able bodied people that can work and contribute are taking advantage of the system without giving back anything to the system. That’s what’s anti-solidarity
> Fully able bodied people that can work and contribute are taking advantage of the system
Evidence? Earlier you seem to be complaining that refugees are admitted or taken care of in the first place. The former is off topic IMO while the latter is taken for granted. Now you apparently shift to objecting that they refuse to work. Which is it?