← Back to context Comment by TheOtherHobbes 8 hours ago Negligence is still a possibility, if there are significant reasonably foreseeable consequences. 2 comments TheOtherHobbes Reply arbll 8 hours ago I think there’s a strong argument that it was hard to foresee the consequences since it was all new. This won’t be true if those incidents continue happening tho. user43928 8 hours ago Where does negligence come into play?In criminal hacking law that explicitly requires intent, or a civil lawsuit about damages?I honestly don't know, but my guess would be the latter.
arbll 8 hours ago I think there’s a strong argument that it was hard to foresee the consequences since it was all new. This won’t be true if those incidents continue happening tho.
user43928 8 hours ago Where does negligence come into play?In criminal hacking law that explicitly requires intent, or a civil lawsuit about damages?I honestly don't know, but my guess would be the latter.
I think there’s a strong argument that it was hard to foresee the consequences since it was all new. This won’t be true if those incidents continue happening tho.
Where does negligence come into play?
In criminal hacking law that explicitly requires intent, or a civil lawsuit about damages?
I honestly don't know, but my guess would be the latter.