Comment by IshKebab
9 hours ago
Hard to disagree. I'm interested, but... the writing sucks.
And there's no excuse now anyway the latest Opus/Astra models are actually tolerable. Use those if you must.
9 hours ago
Hard to disagree. I'm interested, but... the writing sucks.
And there's no excuse now anyway the latest Opus/Astra models are actually tolerable. Use those if you must.
The point of the writing is thinking what you are about to say from difference perspectives. Now, everything gets average and boring if LLMs are getting used all the time. And they still waste so many words that don't benefit reader in any way.
I'm thinking it might be ESL and/or translated, but I could be wrong. There are posts from 2022, but they seem a lot more terse.
Not being able to effectively proofread will make slop even sloppier.
I did my best with the writing, but it clearly didn't land for the two of you. Could you point to one thing, or one pattern, that bothered you most? That would help me improve it.
Did you do your best? I think you can do better.
[edited out snipes]
this is an interesting specimen. vitriol is off the charts even for a solicited critique - I suspect here is a case where the pangram verdict is acting as a sort of license for the critic to treat the author as subhuman
1 reply →
[flagged]