← Back to context

Comment by rafram

12 hours ago

> Even ignoring monetary subsidies

That's what I'm asking - which monetary subsidies?

> not being sued into oblivious by the government for their countless hacks of other companies and countries

That isn't normally how enforcement works, and it hasn't been very long since they disclosed those breaches. If the victims want to pursue legal action, they can, and they still may!

> the slaps on the wrist for massive piracy

So judges and juries are involved in the subsidization conspiracy, too?

> the waving of environmental (and other) regulations in order to allow their data centres to be built an operated

Sure, though if you think this isn't happening in China too, I have a bridge to sell you.

CHIPS act, OBBA, defense, AI upskill grants.

That's just the ones i know off the top of my head in the US. Those programs account for more than 60 billion in committed spend.

The original comments is "DeepSeek, and other Chinese models, are heavily subsidised by the Chinese government"

> That's what I'm asking - which monetary subsidies?

I am listing for you the non-monetary subsidies, which are just as real and equally important.

> not being sued into oblivious by the government for their countless hacks of other companies and countries

If it was one of the Chinese labs doing this hacking, the government would be stepping in. If it was European labs they'd be stepping in. If it was you or I the government would be stepping in. That is a massive subsidy (they don't have to worry about the same legal fees and exposure) and being allowed to continue doing business is in fact priceless.

> So judges and juries are involved in the subsidization conspiracy, too?

There is no conspiracy. They are objectively operating by a different set of rules than you or I could operate in this market.

> Sure, though if you think this isn't happening in China too, I have a bridge to sell you.

I never said it wasn't, I'm saying that it's happening here and it's a very real subsidy.

  • > equally important

    They really aren't. Nothing in the development of these systems, absolutely nothing, is as important as money. Stop these silly false equivalences.

    • These are not silly equivalences.

      All the major labs would be dead in the water if the government acted on the things I mentioned. If they treated the labs the way they would have treated us for all those hacks. Or if they enforced pollution measures (or god forbid ban on-prem turbines because of the climate damage). Or rule that training on data is not fair use, or that ingesting GPL3 code and then turning that into weights counts as a derivative work. Or. Or. Or.

      Those are all just as important as cash.

      1 reply →