Comment by mindcrime
3 hours ago
Totally AI-generated, sure. But saying "No AI edits" at all is going way too far, IMO. Taken to its logical extreme, that even bans using a spell-checker. And what about non native English speakers? Is it really wrong for them to use a translation tool so they can participate?
I mean, it's y'all's site, you can do what you want. But FWIW, I think making that too much of an absolute "bright line" is a net negative for HN.
> to its logical extreme, that even bans using a spell-checker
But we're not taking it to that extreme. We're fine with using LLMs for checking of spelling and grammar, and for suggesting improvements to text you've authored yourself, and then using your own human judgement to apply the changes back into your text.
What we are saying is: don't copy+paste something from an LLM chatbot or translation tool into the Hacker News comment box and submit it.
> making that too much of an absolute "bright line" is a net negative for HN
What matters is the outcome. HN is for thoughtful conversation between humans, and that's what people expect when they come here. If regular HN users have that unpleasant sensation that comes upon realizing that what you're reading was generated by a machine rather than being authored by a thoughtful human, the commenter made a negative contribution to HN.