Comment by hmokiguess
3 hours ago
The velocity of how this space gets reskinned is wild.
Clearly we do not yet feel satisfied with the way we consume and work with agents at scale.
It looks like perhaps rather than skinning we need a more novel UX or workflow to emerge.
I can't help but think all of this is living on borrowed time and eventually it will look more like talking to your "assistant" that fields everything for you and maybe some new async interruption model that fits humans better.
Biggest bottleneck in my opinion still is how to solve for information density.
Thanks so much for saying this!
Even with a single instance of Claude Code, running I am producing so much code that it is impossible to even self-review.
Can we please focus on that?
Self-review is an anti-pattern.
Just to be clear, when I say that it is impossible even to self review, it was an indication of how difficult is to review code of colleagues.
Proofreading an essay before submitting it is an anti pattern?
[dead]
So much this. We don't review the assembly/machine-code that the compiler creates, why do we still review the code the AI generates?
If it works as desired then ship it; if it doesn't then iterate until it does.
5 replies →
I built some tools that lets me view diffs and summon agents to execute changes. You can probably vibe code that in a few minutes.
We simply need neural implant technology to overclock our brains, making the world (and its Claude instances) appear to go slower.
You got downvoted but your joke made me think of the show The Dark Matter and how they had the concept of a hallway with infinite doors to represent the multiverse to the human brain that cannot comprehend the state of superposition.
I sort of get what you're going for maybe? In a sense these things are gonna evolve at a rate where we are not going to be able to operate at their plane and we will need a sort of UX translation