Bloody Cavemen 2 days ago (lrb.co.uk) 7 comments Thevet Reply Add to library Apocryphon 1 hour ago Never knew of Golding’s post-Flies bibliography. Sounds like it’s worth diving into! And wonder if his relationship to Monteith is worth some sort of dramatization. maximilianfeix 4 hours ago [flagged] conartist6 3 hours ago [flagged] lukeasrodgers 2 hours ago I did not get that impression at all. What rhetorical device are you referring to? conartist6 2 hours ago Maybe not. I misread the structure. Look for "required reading" and you'll find the two sentences.
Apocryphon 1 hour ago Never knew of Golding’s post-Flies bibliography. Sounds like it’s worth diving into! And wonder if his relationship to Monteith is worth some sort of dramatization.
conartist6 3 hours ago [flagged] lukeasrodgers 2 hours ago I did not get that impression at all. What rhetorical device are you referring to? conartist6 2 hours ago Maybe not. I misread the structure. Look for "required reading" and you'll find the two sentences.
lukeasrodgers 2 hours ago I did not get that impression at all. What rhetorical device are you referring to? conartist6 2 hours ago Maybe not. I misread the structure. Look for "required reading" and you'll find the two sentences.
conartist6 2 hours ago Maybe not. I misread the structure. Look for "required reading" and you'll find the two sentences.
Never knew of Golding’s post-Flies bibliography. Sounds like it’s worth diving into! And wonder if his relationship to Monteith is worth some sort of dramatization.
[flagged]
[flagged]
I did not get that impression at all. What rhetorical device are you referring to?
Maybe not. I misread the structure. Look for "required reading" and you'll find the two sentences.