Comment by verdverm
13 days ago
There are 100s of web based photo editors, paid and open source. How do you know they are taking yours, not someone else's or making their own with Ai?
I would imagine they all converge on common features and core implementation foundation
There have been only two photo editors that fully support the PSD format: Photopea and Adobe Photoshop. When a new one appears, which fully supports the PSD format, from an anonymous creator, it is very likely a copy one of these two. And they usually name it Photopea-offline, etc.
but does it actually fully support the PSD format or is it false advertising?
This day in age, we need to verify ourselves
Can you show us an example? How did you verify?
These Github repositories contain copies of my JS files (identical JS - letter by letter), with a few lines deleted to allow running it on any domain.
I wanted to discuss the behaviour of Github without giving these "projects" even more attention.
The website is public, you can verify yourself.
5 replies →
> How do you know they are taking yours, not someone else's
Because if the javascript source matches the source in the repo, then they copied it
it doesn't sound like that though and we have no way to verify
That's what they said though. It's the website with the ads removed
I guess if you wanted to actually check it then you could compare the javascript from the site and the javascript of the projects on github. Both are accessible