> because it would be doing so without having access to the source
I find it unlikely that photopea was never scraped for AI training considering they are looking so hard for new material they started buying up and scanning old books.
When it can do that, the people can also describe the output, i.e. the fact that your original website even exists is irrelevant for what people are able to do.
1:1? No, because AI won't know all the outputs, only the ones you show it.
Also if it could recreate it that would be fine, because it would be doing so without having access to the source.
> because it would be doing so without having access to the source
I find it unlikely that photopea was never scraped for AI training considering they are looking so hard for new material they started buying up and scanning old books.
>only the ones you show it
This doesn't sound that hard to automate these days.
When it can do that, the people can also describe the output, i.e. the fact that your original website even exists is irrelevant for what people are able to do.
Maybe it can, but that's not what this post or comment is about