A font recreated from photographs of classic Commodore 64 keycaps

11 hours ago (github.com)

This reminds me of this beautifully written article about the font Gorton.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49201953

The old versions of VIC-20 used a font called Microgramma.

https://www.reddit.com/r/vintagecomputing/comments/1pjw7q6/t...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microgramma_(typeface)

  • Perhaps best known for being the basis for Eurostile, a staple of SF movie typography.

    • Microgramma and Eurostile are all time classics. I have so many old electronics that used them on the control panels.

      There's an open source font QTEurotype that does an excellent approximation that I've been using in a recent project

>https://github.com/szabadkai/c64-keyboard-font/issues/4

This saddens me, frankly.

  • The S is misproportioned. M should have the middle go all the way to the baseline. The middle stems on 3 and 4 are too long and too short. The punctuation is all different sizes. This is just me glancing at the normalized comparison image. It's really obvious.

  • It's an asshole issue, but at the same time the AI that did the work isn't going to have it's feelings hurt.

  • What a confused comment.

    "There is no RETURN, SHIFT...", "Too many F keys". They are confusing a typeface with trying to replicate the keyboard keys.

    The arrows are not the cursor keys, but based on the ESC key.

    They are right about the @ character though, it looks quite wonky.

  • Why would keys with full words like shift/return/etc be useful in creating a font. Basic comprehension skills are at a loss for this user. The issue comment should have ended with the first sentence. However, could the keys with full words have been used to provide clues on kerning or other spacing to use when building the font?

If creatively expanded to more characters, this would make a pretty nice coding font.

Oh gosh, this is really rather nice.

Looks nice. The C-64 had an excellent keyboard typeface

I think peak keycaps font were the ones used in the Epson QX-10, Epson HX-20, Tandy 100, and the common C-64.

The special characters / punctuation are not aligned. The !#$% characters either float too high or need to be a little bigger.

(Yes, I copied the image from the page into Paint and drew a line)

thank you so much for this! love how this looks, it's such a clean typeface

EDIT: I kept getting problems downloading it--errors acting like nothing was there. After clicking around on the download links a few times, it eventually made it to my downloads and I got the file. Not sure what's going on there, but just a heads up for anyone else

"!" is like half of the size of "?". Even if that's faithful to the keyboard, it is very annoying.

  • It's not faithful. The AI took the original image and assumed the ! was supposed to be elevated like that. This project is low-effort AI generated.

    Edit to add: This GitHub user has a over a hundred repositories full of random slop. It's clearly being used to generate activity for a resume or something.

Nice. It never really occurred to me how different these are from 64C keycaps. I guess through our affinity for retro look, the original typeface ended up feeling more modern/current than the newer one.

It’s a very pleasant looking humanist sans. Now I’m wondering about the story of the original typeface – were the glyphs specifically designed for the keyboard? Seems more likely that some existing font was used.

  • Good question! I've looked into this a bit myself and I think the best overall match is Akzidenz-Grotesk Condensed, albeit not exact: https://www.myfonts.com/products/condensed-regular-akzidenz-...

    The G is different (look at the lower right corner), the 0 (zero) has a slash which looks custom, and the Q is very different (it looks like a letter O with a piece of another O added for the tail).

    And yes, since it's the standard comment about fonts, this is a commercial font that costs an arm and a leg.

  • Kind of ambivalent state of things, a research thread to solve that provenance issue to some degree of certainty is always only one prompt away too.

A weird thing: the exclamation mark `!` seems to be elevated from the baseline, judging from the specimen.

The download links seem broken, does anyone have the TTF?