← Back to context Comment by codingjoe 11 hours ago Is this the same patent/license nightmare as JPEG2000 ? 3 comments codingjoe Reply videah 11 hours ago No, JPEG XL is an open standard. 201984 11 hours ago "open" in the sense that you have to pay $200 to read it, anyway. codingjoe 11 hours ago That's good to hear. Let's hope there's hardware adoption on the camera end soon. As an image lib maintainer the codec wars were driving me nuts.
videah 11 hours ago No, JPEG XL is an open standard. 201984 11 hours ago "open" in the sense that you have to pay $200 to read it, anyway. codingjoe 11 hours ago That's good to hear. Let's hope there's hardware adoption on the camera end soon. As an image lib maintainer the codec wars were driving me nuts.
codingjoe 11 hours ago That's good to hear. Let's hope there's hardware adoption on the camera end soon. As an image lib maintainer the codec wars were driving me nuts.
No, JPEG XL is an open standard.
"open" in the sense that you have to pay $200 to read it, anyway.
That's good to hear. Let's hope there's hardware adoption on the camera end soon. As an image lib maintainer the codec wars were driving me nuts.