← Back to context Comment by spider-mario 11 hours ago Much worse at lossless at least. 4 comments spider-mario Reply farlight 10 hours ago Depends on who you listen to, or what you test it on. It goes either way, and avif is typically significantly better at small files sizes where loading speed (or saving data) is the priority. Broiler9437 5 hours ago Definitely not with lossless. It consistently lose to JXL and WebP spider-mario 10 hours ago On lossless? No. mort96 8 hours ago Really? The lossless comparisons I've seen has JXL winning over AVIF, do you have a link to the comparisons you've seen where AVIF wins in lossless?
farlight 10 hours ago Depends on who you listen to, or what you test it on. It goes either way, and avif is typically significantly better at small files sizes where loading speed (or saving data) is the priority. Broiler9437 5 hours ago Definitely not with lossless. It consistently lose to JXL and WebP spider-mario 10 hours ago On lossless? No. mort96 8 hours ago Really? The lossless comparisons I've seen has JXL winning over AVIF, do you have a link to the comparisons you've seen where AVIF wins in lossless?
mort96 8 hours ago Really? The lossless comparisons I've seen has JXL winning over AVIF, do you have a link to the comparisons you've seen where AVIF wins in lossless?
Depends on who you listen to, or what you test it on. It goes either way, and avif is typically significantly better at small files sizes where loading speed (or saving data) is the priority.
Definitely not with lossless. It consistently lose to JXL and WebP
On lossless? No.
Really? The lossless comparisons I've seen has JXL winning over AVIF, do you have a link to the comparisons you've seen where AVIF wins in lossless?