← Back to context Comment by erikvanoosten 9 hours ago Two safety protection mechanisms. For example: Rust + Sandbox. 3 comments erikvanoosten Reply groundzeros2015 7 hours ago If it’s sandboxed why do I need rust?What counts as a “safety mechanism”? dtf 7 hours ago It's the "rule of two" safety guideline mentioned and linked to in the article:https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/s...If you use a safe language like Rust, you can afford untrusted input and no sandboxing.If you use an unsafe language such as C++, you must chose between trusted inputs or sandboxing.I was curious as to where rfgplk's implementation lay within the Venn diagram. groundzeros2015 7 hours ago What counts as two safety mechanisms?> you can afford untrusted input and no sandboxing.I would not trust a rust program un-sandboxed! There are security bugs in rust itself.
groundzeros2015 7 hours ago If it’s sandboxed why do I need rust?What counts as a “safety mechanism”? dtf 7 hours ago It's the "rule of two" safety guideline mentioned and linked to in the article:https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/s...If you use a safe language like Rust, you can afford untrusted input and no sandboxing.If you use an unsafe language such as C++, you must chose between trusted inputs or sandboxing.I was curious as to where rfgplk's implementation lay within the Venn diagram. groundzeros2015 7 hours ago What counts as two safety mechanisms?> you can afford untrusted input and no sandboxing.I would not trust a rust program un-sandboxed! There are security bugs in rust itself.
dtf 7 hours ago It's the "rule of two" safety guideline mentioned and linked to in the article:https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/s...If you use a safe language like Rust, you can afford untrusted input and no sandboxing.If you use an unsafe language such as C++, you must chose between trusted inputs or sandboxing.I was curious as to where rfgplk's implementation lay within the Venn diagram. groundzeros2015 7 hours ago What counts as two safety mechanisms?> you can afford untrusted input and no sandboxing.I would not trust a rust program un-sandboxed! There are security bugs in rust itself.
groundzeros2015 7 hours ago What counts as two safety mechanisms?> you can afford untrusted input and no sandboxing.I would not trust a rust program un-sandboxed! There are security bugs in rust itself.
If it’s sandboxed why do I need rust?
What counts as a “safety mechanism”?
It's the "rule of two" safety guideline mentioned and linked to in the article:
https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/s...
If you use a safe language like Rust, you can afford untrusted input and no sandboxing.
If you use an unsafe language such as C++, you must chose between trusted inputs or sandboxing.
I was curious as to where rfgplk's implementation lay within the Venn diagram.
What counts as two safety mechanisms?
> you can afford untrusted input and no sandboxing.
I would not trust a rust program un-sandboxed! There are security bugs in rust itself.