Comment by keeda

You're right that this is a copyright infringement case, but I'm not sure if AI is relevant here, as it seems like a pretty straightforward rip-off.

Also TFA is about a much narrower ruling than it first seems:

>The 3rd Circuit distinguished Thomson Reuters' case from other AI training cases. Unlike the technology in those cases, Ross' search engine did not feature generative AI — AI that creates new content — and the appeals court said in a footnote that concerns raised by the US Department of Justice in a copyright lawsuit against OpenAI "do not apply here."