← Back to context Comment by ameliaquining 3 hours ago Suggestion: Allow the user to sort the list by number of applications. 4 comments ameliaquining Reply skrtskrt 2 hours ago More applications should mean they have to compete on price tbh.Sure if AirBnb wants to administer .airbnb and charge a lot, whatever.But `.bit` domains should be some bargain basement price if so many people want to run it. input_sh 2 hours ago That's exactly how it works. For example, Google's winning bid for .app ended up being $25m. input_sh 2 hours ago Top five: .agent (13 applicants), .bit (11), .hub (10), .brand (10), .api (10) irs 1 hour ago added a new sort option for this
skrtskrt 2 hours ago More applications should mean they have to compete on price tbh.Sure if AirBnb wants to administer .airbnb and charge a lot, whatever.But `.bit` domains should be some bargain basement price if so many people want to run it. input_sh 2 hours ago That's exactly how it works. For example, Google's winning bid for .app ended up being $25m.
input_sh 2 hours ago That's exactly how it works. For example, Google's winning bid for .app ended up being $25m.
More applications should mean they have to compete on price tbh.
Sure if AirBnb wants to administer .airbnb and charge a lot, whatever.
But `.bit` domains should be some bargain basement price if so many people want to run it.
That's exactly how it works. For example, Google's winning bid for .app ended up being $25m.
Top five: .agent (13 applicants), .bit (11), .hub (10), .brand (10), .api (10)
added a new sort option for this