← Back to context Comment by socializer 2 hours ago It's an LLM-generated article. 2 comments socializer Reply jampekka 1 hour ago How do you know? Doesn't read particularly LLM written to me, and even if it is, it's quite well written.The author has been blogging about this kind of stuff for over 20 years. I'd be surprised if they suddenly let bots autonomously spam their blog. raphman 1 hour ago Yeah, sounds human-written to me, too. Out of habit I checked with Pangram - which identifies some parts as AI-written. (I think that might be false positives but am not 100% sure.)
jampekka 1 hour ago How do you know? Doesn't read particularly LLM written to me, and even if it is, it's quite well written.The author has been blogging about this kind of stuff for over 20 years. I'd be surprised if they suddenly let bots autonomously spam their blog. raphman 1 hour ago Yeah, sounds human-written to me, too. Out of habit I checked with Pangram - which identifies some parts as AI-written. (I think that might be false positives but am not 100% sure.)
raphman 1 hour ago Yeah, sounds human-written to me, too. Out of habit I checked with Pangram - which identifies some parts as AI-written. (I think that might be false positives but am not 100% sure.)
How do you know? Doesn't read particularly LLM written to me, and even if it is, it's quite well written.
The author has been blogging about this kind of stuff for over 20 years. I'd be surprised if they suddenly let bots autonomously spam their blog.
Yeah, sounds human-written to me, too. Out of habit I checked with Pangram - which identifies some parts as AI-written. (I think that might be false positives but am not 100% sure.)