← Back to context

Comment by F3nd0

1 hour ago

Personally, I avoid WebP out of spite. While it has greatly improved over previous formats in certain uses, it has been lacking or offering only marginal improvements in others. That didn’t stop Google from pushing it hard on the web.

I was left feeling like the next time we adopt a format that tries to do everything, it should actually do everything just as well or better than its predecessors. Lo and behold, JPEG XL is probably the first format which actually achieves this, covering all kinds of pictures you can think of and doing a pretty good job on all of them. So for the first time, I feel like the format has actually earned its place in the ecosystem, rather than just being some megacorporation’s personal favourite.

Of course, this point of view is emotional more than rational. Technically, WebP is a sensible choice, so I don’t mean to discourage anyone from using it today.

It wasn't some one company's choice and push. Almost everyone wins when bandwidth is cut and you get higher quality for less space. I'd argue most people's hatred for webp purely comes down to a few other corporations like microsoft, not supporting it well in the early days and blaming the format instead.