← Back to context Comment by davidguetta 1 day ago exactly, cf andrew wiles first proof of fermat's last theorem 2 comments davidguetta Reply anonymous908213 1 day ago Yes, cf indeed. He did not publish it, he shared it privately and then spent the next year correcting it before publication. davidguetta 1 day ago ok, that said there has alaways been a bunch of "maybe theorems" it's was a thing even in paul erdos books i think. now we have "maybe proofs". still better than "no proofs"
anonymous908213 1 day ago Yes, cf indeed. He did not publish it, he shared it privately and then spent the next year correcting it before publication. davidguetta 1 day ago ok, that said there has alaways been a bunch of "maybe theorems" it's was a thing even in paul erdos books i think. now we have "maybe proofs". still better than "no proofs"
davidguetta 1 day ago ok, that said there has alaways been a bunch of "maybe theorems" it's was a thing even in paul erdos books i think. now we have "maybe proofs". still better than "no proofs"
Yes, cf indeed. He did not publish it, he shared it privately and then spent the next year correcting it before publication.
ok, that said there has alaways been a bunch of "maybe theorems" it's was a thing even in paul erdos books i think. now we have "maybe proofs". still better than "no proofs"