← Back to context Comment by glimshe 7 hours ago I don't think "top talent" is very well represented in the companies listed above... 3 comments glimshe Reply shimman 7 hours ago It is when you think high salaries = top talent. Ancalagon 7 hours ago None of the above companies have what I would consider to be high salaries relative to their tech peers. JumpCrisscross 6 hours ago Microsoft is also included [1].[1] https://www.ft.com/content/5cfecbba-69ed-42d0-98fd-3ae019144...
shimman 7 hours ago It is when you think high salaries = top talent. Ancalagon 7 hours ago None of the above companies have what I would consider to be high salaries relative to their tech peers. JumpCrisscross 6 hours ago Microsoft is also included [1].[1] https://www.ft.com/content/5cfecbba-69ed-42d0-98fd-3ae019144...
Ancalagon 7 hours ago None of the above companies have what I would consider to be high salaries relative to their tech peers. JumpCrisscross 6 hours ago Microsoft is also included [1].[1] https://www.ft.com/content/5cfecbba-69ed-42d0-98fd-3ae019144...
JumpCrisscross 6 hours ago Microsoft is also included [1].[1] https://www.ft.com/content/5cfecbba-69ed-42d0-98fd-3ae019144...
It is when you think high salaries = top talent.
None of the above companies have what I would consider to be high salaries relative to their tech peers.
Microsoft is also included [1].
[1] https://www.ft.com/content/5cfecbba-69ed-42d0-98fd-3ae019144...