Comment by foldr
2 hours ago
There’s already several comments in that thread explaining that the linked X post makes some glaring factual errors.
2 hours ago
There’s already several comments in that thread explaining that the linked X post makes some glaring factual errors.
There is exactly one comment about the post and it only disputes her title at a date. It does not address any of the other information.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50002873
As I described. Unfortunately neither pieces of information are available for others to read and evaluate.