← Back to context Comment by gchamonlive 8 hours ago [flagged] 5 comments gchamonlive Reply schiffern 7 hours ago If you zoom out it's closer to, "this is an outrage. My billionaires were supposed to buy that election!"https://www.forbes.com/sites/dereksaul/2024/10/30/kamala-har... gchamonlive 7 hours ago Yes and this is why the US is a oligarchy not an autocracy (yet)Corporate political donations and opinions should be outlawed pc86 6 hours ago What is a "corporate political opinion?" 1 reply → georgemcbay 7 hours ago Citizens United was an awful, anti-democratic decision, regardless of which side "your" billionaires are on.
schiffern 7 hours ago If you zoom out it's closer to, "this is an outrage. My billionaires were supposed to buy that election!"https://www.forbes.com/sites/dereksaul/2024/10/30/kamala-har... gchamonlive 7 hours ago Yes and this is why the US is a oligarchy not an autocracy (yet)Corporate political donations and opinions should be outlawed pc86 6 hours ago What is a "corporate political opinion?" 1 reply → georgemcbay 7 hours ago Citizens United was an awful, anti-democratic decision, regardless of which side "your" billionaires are on.
gchamonlive 7 hours ago Yes and this is why the US is a oligarchy not an autocracy (yet)Corporate political donations and opinions should be outlawed pc86 6 hours ago What is a "corporate political opinion?" 1 reply →
georgemcbay 7 hours ago Citizens United was an awful, anti-democratic decision, regardless of which side "your" billionaires are on.
If you zoom out it's closer to, "this is an outrage. My billionaires were supposed to buy that election!"
https://www.forbes.com/sites/dereksaul/2024/10/30/kamala-har...
Yes and this is why the US is a oligarchy not an autocracy (yet)
Corporate political donations and opinions should be outlawed
What is a "corporate political opinion?"
1 reply →
Citizens United was an awful, anti-democratic decision, regardless of which side "your" billionaires are on.