← Back to context

Comment by digitaltrees

7 hours ago

I stand by my argument after reading your fact checking.

The fact checking states:

- OpenAI could not rule out the possibility that private conversations influenced its model. Partly supported - OpenAI actually trained on those private conversations to obtain the method. Unproven

Classifying the second point as unproven is a pedantic sleight of hand. It logically follows that if a model was influenced by a set of data to produce output incorporating it into its analysis it doesn’t really matter if it was “trained”.