← Back to context Comment by weird-eye-issue 10 hours ago Cloudflare is a publicly traded company. 5 comments weird-eye-issue Reply officialchicken 10 hours ago There is nothing that requires a VC to sell part or all of their shares when an IPO occurs. And you can read their S1[0] to verify.[0] https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1477333/000119312519... weird-eye-issue 7 hours ago > There is nothing that requires a VC to sell part or all of their shares when an IPO occursOkay, but I never said there was, so nice strawman argumentAt this point they are already up 1000% on their investment oh_ok_lol 10 hours ago No people on the Boards of both companies? Sorry for being cynical. Seen so much funny stuff in this industry. Good for Deno. Better choice given the talent behind it than Bun, IMHO. rvz 10 hours ago ...And the VCs who invested in Deno will be getting their return from Cloudflare acquiring it, since they are "not allowed to lose".They would rather have Deno pursue an acquisition instead of shutting down and losing their investment.The only questionable detail about this announcement is it was for an undisclosed amount. Make of that what you will. weird-eye-issue 9 hours ago > not allowed to loseI mean that's just not how it works, most VC investments go to zero and they know that.
officialchicken 10 hours ago There is nothing that requires a VC to sell part or all of their shares when an IPO occurs. And you can read their S1[0] to verify.[0] https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1477333/000119312519... weird-eye-issue 7 hours ago > There is nothing that requires a VC to sell part or all of their shares when an IPO occursOkay, but I never said there was, so nice strawman argumentAt this point they are already up 1000% on their investment
weird-eye-issue 7 hours ago > There is nothing that requires a VC to sell part or all of their shares when an IPO occursOkay, but I never said there was, so nice strawman argumentAt this point they are already up 1000% on their investment
oh_ok_lol 10 hours ago No people on the Boards of both companies? Sorry for being cynical. Seen so much funny stuff in this industry. Good for Deno. Better choice given the talent behind it than Bun, IMHO.
rvz 10 hours ago ...And the VCs who invested in Deno will be getting their return from Cloudflare acquiring it, since they are "not allowed to lose".They would rather have Deno pursue an acquisition instead of shutting down and losing their investment.The only questionable detail about this announcement is it was for an undisclosed amount. Make of that what you will. weird-eye-issue 9 hours ago > not allowed to loseI mean that's just not how it works, most VC investments go to zero and they know that.
weird-eye-issue 9 hours ago > not allowed to loseI mean that's just not how it works, most VC investments go to zero and they know that.
There is nothing that requires a VC to sell part or all of their shares when an IPO occurs. And you can read their S1[0] to verify.
[0] https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1477333/000119312519...
> There is nothing that requires a VC to sell part or all of their shares when an IPO occurs
Okay, but I never said there was, so nice strawman argument
At this point they are already up 1000% on their investment
No people on the Boards of both companies? Sorry for being cynical. Seen so much funny stuff in this industry. Good for Deno. Better choice given the talent behind it than Bun, IMHO.
...And the VCs who invested in Deno will be getting their return from Cloudflare acquiring it, since they are "not allowed to lose".
They would rather have Deno pursue an acquisition instead of shutting down and losing their investment.
The only questionable detail about this announcement is it was for an undisclosed amount. Make of that what you will.
> not allowed to lose
I mean that's just not how it works, most VC investments go to zero and they know that.