← Back to context Comment by bambax 9 hours ago For asynchronous downloading of huge media files, speed should not be a priority? 4 comments bambax Reply lavela 9 hours ago Afaik it's used more for circumventing anti-bot measures and solving challenges than the download handling itself. toomuchtodo 9 hours ago This is accurate (maintainer of downstream project that depends on yt-dlp for archiving operations). mvdtnz 1 hour ago What makes Deno more suitable for this than any other runtime? It's just executing JS code right? I wouldn't think this would leave any meaningful fingerprint. antisthenes 9 hours ago When downloading huge media files, the only speed you're being limited by is your bandwidth.Everything else is completely negligible.
lavela 9 hours ago Afaik it's used more for circumventing anti-bot measures and solving challenges than the download handling itself. toomuchtodo 9 hours ago This is accurate (maintainer of downstream project that depends on yt-dlp for archiving operations).
toomuchtodo 9 hours ago This is accurate (maintainer of downstream project that depends on yt-dlp for archiving operations).
mvdtnz 1 hour ago What makes Deno more suitable for this than any other runtime? It's just executing JS code right? I wouldn't think this would leave any meaningful fingerprint.
antisthenes 9 hours ago When downloading huge media files, the only speed you're being limited by is your bandwidth.Everything else is completely negligible.
Afaik it's used more for circumventing anti-bot measures and solving challenges than the download handling itself.
This is accurate (maintainer of downstream project that depends on yt-dlp for archiving operations).
What makes Deno more suitable for this than any other runtime? It's just executing JS code right? I wouldn't think this would leave any meaningful fingerprint.
When downloading huge media files, the only speed you're being limited by is your bandwidth.
Everything else is completely negligible.