← Back to context

Comment by anon84873628

11 hours ago

Nothing incongruent there. The campaign funds can of course be used on wedge issues that don't actually relate to Israel. Changing public perception towards scenes of destroyed homes and dead children is much more difficult.

16 comments

anon84873628

Reply
reliabilityguy  11 hours ago

> Nothing incongruent there.

Doesn’t look this way to me. If Israeli lobby is so powerful to make sure that Trump is elected, then why stop there?

It seems to me that it’s always easier to blame someone for failures than to do an actual post mortem.

  • anon84873628  6 hours ago

    It's not some magic wand to "make sure Trump is elected". It's give him a slight bump up and Harris a slight push down (mostly by demotivating left-leaning voters so they stay home). Affecting thin margins in an election is different from changing everybody's mind about something.

  • SauciestGNU  9 hours ago

    I think the actual postmortem analysis is that cosigning a genocide against an ethnic group whose members and sympathizers are a must-win bloc in a must-win state (Michigan) was a tactical error. Kamala could have distanced herself from Biden's "bear hug" relationship with Israel. Other Dems won statewide races in Michigan who didn't carry the genocide baggage.