← Back to context

Comment by chopete3

8 hours ago

Most of the times the opposition doesn't get enough credit. It feels as if the winner did everything.

In this particular case the credit goes go the opposite side. They screwed up so much as to make this possible.

I have heard the analysis by political pundits and I agree with it in context, but it’s still incredibly insane.

We basically cannot trust America anymore since its people have, as a whole, have lost the ability to reason and think critically. And the people in power want it that way. They prefer do disenfranchise most of their population so they can win elections using their core base who will believe anything.

>In this particular case the credit goes go the opposite side. They screwed up so much as to make this possible.

I'm sorry, but this is complete horse manure, albeit it's become a favorite fantasy/apologist/woe-is-me take on the right as the Trump disaster continues to unfold. But the opposition had NOTHING to do with Trump being chosen for POTUS. The Right had a perfectly decent choice: Nikki Haley. She had plenty right policies and no doubt would have made much of the left very upset, but she is also intelligent, sane, and cares to the normal degree about the country and basics of the constitution. She'd have been fine. She'd also have trivially creamed Democrats, and be holding Congress vastly better fwiw.

But out of the entirety of the US, only a single state (Vermont) voted against Trump. Every single last bit of the rest of the country chose Trump. There were no Democrats on the list for the Republican primary. Republicans could have sent Trump packing no problem, and then taken the WH and a bigger chunk of the House/Senate to boot. Trump being in the general and then WH was and forever will be 100% on the GOP.

Careful, hackernews has loads of redditors these days, and they hate any of their fantasy narratives being challenged by common reason.

Crazy take. Kamala and Hilary were fine candidates. Trump won by convincing the electorate "she's for them". Just straight up fake news

  • Kamala was pretty bad. I think she had the left most voting record in the senate when they needed a centralist?

    • Bullshit. She was centrist. It did not mattered, because lies from the right.

      Most likely, they needed someone actually radical, actually more on the left to actually put up the fight.

      2 replies →